Atención farmacéutica al paciente ingresado en una unidad multidisciplinar de paciente crónico complejo / Pharmaceutical care for the patients admitted to a multidisciplinary complex chronic patient unit

Objetivo: evaluar la contribución del farmacéutico mediante el análisis de la prescripción potencialmente inapropiada y la conciliación del tratamiento domiciliario en la unidad de pacientes crónicos complejos de un hospital terciario. Métodos: estudio observacional, prospectivo y multidisciplinar de los pacientes de la unidad de pacientes crónicos complejos de un hospital durante febrero de 2019 - junio de 2020. El equipo multidisciplinar del crónico complejo elaboró un checklist con una selección de fármacos no recomendados basado en los criterios STOPP/START, Beers y PRISCUS y fármacos susceptibles de desprescripción según los criterios LESS-CHRON. El farmacéutico aplicaba el checklist diariamente en los pacientes que ingresaban en la unidad, además de realizar la conciliación del tratamiento domiciliario revisando el tratamiento prescrito con el detallado en la receta electrónica domiciliaria. Por eso, se recogieron las siguientes variables: edad, sexo y número de fármacos al ingreso como variables independientes, y variables dependientes: número de fármacos al alta, tipo de prescripción potencialmente inapropiada, motivos de conciliación, fármacos implicados y grado de aceptación de la recomendación por parte del médico prescriptor para evaluar la contribución farmacéutica. El análisis estadístico se realizó con IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. Resultados : se revisaron 621 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 84 años (56,4% mujeres), y se intervino en 218 (35,1%). La mediana del número de fármacos fue de 11 (2-26) al ingreso y de 10 (0-25) al alta. Se realizaron 373 intervenciones: 235 por conciliación de la medicación (78,3% aceptadas), 71 por medicamentos no recomendados (57,7% aceptadas), 42 por desprescripción (61,9% aceptadas) y 25 por otros motivos. ... (AU)

Objective: To assess the pharmacist’s contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital.MethodObservational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22.Results: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). ...(AU)

Pharmaceutical care for the patients admitted to a multidisciplinary complex chronic patient unit. / [Artículo traducido] Atención farmacéutica al paciente ingresado en una unidad multidisciplinar de paciente crónico complejo.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacist's contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Observational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. RESULTS: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). Moreover, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of drugs at admission between patients included in the complex chronic programme and those not included (p = 0.001), and in the number of drugs at discharge (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic patient unit improves patient safety and quality of care. The selected criteria were useful for detecting inappropriate drugs in this population and favoured deprescription.

Pharmaceutical care for the patients admitted to a multidisciplinary complex chronic patient unit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacist's contributions by analyzing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Observational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019-June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and Priscus criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. RESULTS: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge. 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). Moreover, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of drugs at admission between patients included in the complex chronic programme and those not included (p = 0.001), and in the number of drugs at discharge (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic patient unit improves patient safety and quality of care. The selected criteria were useful for detecting inappropriate drugs in this population and favored deprescription.

Comparación de los índices PROFUND y PALIAR en pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica no oncológica en fase avanzada / Comparison between PROFUND and PALIAR indexes in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic diseases

Fundamento y objetivo: Comparar la rentabilidad de los índices PALIAR y PROFUND para predecir la mortalidad en pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica no oncológica en fase avanzada. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohortes, prospectivo y multicéntrico con pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedades crónicas no oncológicas en fase avanzada ingresados en departamentos de medicina interna entre el 1 de julio y el 31 de diciembre de 2014. Se recogieron datos de edad, género, categorías de pluripatología, enfermedad avanzada, comorbilidad, valoración funcional y cognitiva, síntomas de enfermedad terminal, necesidad de cuidador, ingresos en los 3 y 12 meses previos, número de fármacos, y se calcularon los índices PROFUND y PALIAR. Tras un seguimiento durante 12 meses la mortalidad se valoró con las curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y la rentabilidad de los índices con las curvas ROC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 213 pacientes con edad media 83 (7) años y 106 (49,8%) eran mujeres. La mortalidad a los 6 meses fue del 40,4% y a los 12 del 50,2%. Los pacientes fallecidos puntuaban más alto en los índices PROFUND [11,2(4,2) frente a 8,5(3,9); p<0,001] y PALIAR [6,7 (4,6) frente a 3,6 (3,1); p<0,001]. La capacidad discriminativa del índice PALIAR a los 6 meses (área bajo la curva 0,734; IC95% 0,665-0,803) fue superior a la del índice PROFUND y no hubo diferencias a los 12 meses. Conclusiones: En pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica en fase avanzada el índice PALIAR tiene un rendimiento mayor que el índice PROFUND para predecir la mortalidad a los 6 meses y similar a los 12 meses

Background and objective: To compare the discrimination power of PROFUND and PALIAR indexes for predicting mortality in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease. Material and methods: Prospective multicentre cohort study. We included polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, who were admitted to internal medicine departments between July 1st and December 31th, 2014. Data was collected from each patient on age, sex, categories of polypathology, advanced disease, comorbidity, functional and cognitive assessment, terminal illness symptoms, need for caregiver, hospitalisation in the past three and 12 months and number of drugs. We calculated the PROFUND and PALIAR indexes and conducted a 12-month follow-up. We assessed mortality with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the discrimination of indexes with the ROC curves. Results: We included 213 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 83.0 (7.0) years, 106 (49.8%) of whom were female. Mortality at six months was 40.4% and at 12 months 50.2%. Deceased patients scored higher scores on the PROFUND [11.2(4.2) vs 8.5(3.9); P<.001] and PALIAR [6.7 (4.6) vs 3.6(3.1); p<0,001] indexes. The discrimination of PALIAR index at six months (under the curve area 0.734 95%CI 0.665-0.803) was higher than of PROFUND, and there was no difference at 12 months. Conclusions: In polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, the PALIAR index had better discrimination power than PROFUND index at 66 months and there were no differences at 12 months

Comparison between PROFUND and PALIAR indexes in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic diseases. / Comparación de los índices PROFUND y PALIAR en pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica no oncológica en fase avanzada.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the discrimination power of PROFUND and PALIAR indexes for predicting mortality in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective multicentre cohort study. We included polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, who were admitted to internal medicine departments between July 1st and December 31th, 2014. Data was collected from each patient on age, sex, categories of polypathology, advanced disease, comorbidity, functional and cognitive assessment, terminal illness symptoms, need for caregiver, hospitalisation in the past three and 12 months and number of drugs. We calculated the PROFUND and PALIAR indexes and conducted a 12-month follow-up. We assessed mortality with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the discrimination of indexes with the ROC curves. RESULTS: We included 213 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 83.0 (7.0) years, 106 (49.8%) of whom were female. Mortality at six months was 40.4% and at 12 months 50.2%. Deceased patients scored higher scores on the PROFUND [11.2(4.2) vs 8.5(3.9); P<.001] and PALIAR [6.7 (4.6) vs 3.6(3.1); p<0,001] indexes. The discrimination of PALIAR index at six months (under the curve area 0.734 95%CI 0.665-0.803) was higher than of PROFUND, and there was no difference at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, the PALIAR index had better discrimination power than PROFUND index at 66 months and there were no differences at 12 months.